Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Collen's avatar

Despite Steyerl's defense, I think there is still a case to be made for the pursuit of aesthetic excellence even in digital spaces; art is what is left over after all the utilitarian concerns are addressed, and there is something in the human psyche that craves beauty. To reduce the digital side of things to mere information flow is to concede to the rampant utilitarianism that pervades our current society; such a situation might be able to provide us with all the necessary data points but there will be something missing, the human element which speaks to our soul. Instagram might at first be seeming to stand against this "mere utility" ethos, but the company's aesthetic is merely pursuing utilitarianism from a different angle. I'm sure the crazy patterns evident on the clothing of the models in an Ingres or Klimt portrait would fail to serve the uses that Instagram requires. Oddly coincidental, that Instagram and the Metaverse are operated by the same company!

What is needed are more "un-grammable hang zones," as described in this Blackbird Spyplane report. https://www.blackbirdspyplane.com/p/un-grammable-hang-zone-manifesto

Expand full comment
Jim Meredith's avatar

But the "hardware" we used to use included magazines, movie theaters and museums where collection and curation usually gave us the best of images and objects.

More of the medium being the message, I guess.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts